cars data

Google
 
Mobile Phones > Ericsson

Ericsson A1018s
Ericsson A2618
Ericsson A2628
Ericsson A3618
Ericsson GA 318
Ericsson GA 628
Ericsson GF 337
Ericsson GF 388
Ericsson GF 768
Ericsson GF 788
Ericsson GF 788e
Ericsson GH 218
Ericsson GH 337
Ericsson GH 388
Ericsson GH 688
Ericsson GO 118
Ericsson GS 18
Ericsson GS 337
Ericsson I 888
Ericsson PF 768
Ericsson R250s PRO
Ericsson R310s
Ericsson R320
Ericsson R380
Ericsson R520m
Ericsson R600
Ericsson SH 888
Ericsson S 868
Ericsson T10s
Ericsson T18s
Ericsson T20e
Ericsson T20s
Ericsson T28 World
Ericsson T28s
Ericsson T29s
Ericsson T36
Ericsson T39
Ericsson T65
Ericsson T66
Ericsson T68
Ericsson SH 888
Ericsson SH 888


General
NetworkGsm 900 / Gsm 1800
Announced1998
StatusDiscontinued
Size
Dimensions130 X 49 X 22 Mm
Weight195 G
Display
TypeAlphanumeric
Size3 X 12 Chars
 - Fixed Icons
Ringtones
TypeMonophonic
Amount10
CustomizationComposer
Vibration No
Memory
Phonebook100
Call Records 
Card SlotNo
Data
GprsNo
HscsdNo
EdgeNo
3gNo
WlanNo
BluetoothNo
Infrared PortYes
Usb 
Features
MessagingSms
Browser 
ClockYes
AlarmYes
GamesNo
Colors 
Languages24
CameraNo
 - Serial Port
Battery
 Standard, 800 Mah Nimh
Stand-by80 H
Talk Time265 Min

Ericsson - SH 888
Ericsson SH888

Advantages largish, heavyish! , easy to read screen, good sized keypad
Disadvantages battery life not great, no wap or predictive texting

I am looking to replace my SH-888, as the microphone is now broken (not surprising, really - I left it out in the rain overnight). And I'm looking to buy another one, hopefully identical.

In the last year I've had four other phones, all more advanced or up-to-date in various ways, and taken each one back within the cool-off period. Hello/goodbye to a Nokia 3310, a Sony J5, a Motorola 280 and a Sendo 200. All have had severe drawbacks.

Here's why I still approve of my SH-888. It's not because I got used to it, but I liked it from the off. It feels right, it feels larger, it feels heavier, it's tougher, the keys are usable to my stubby fingers, the text is large, clear and legible.

It's got a 1st generation (9.6k) modem, which works ok, and infra-red (which I could never get to work), but it worked fine with the supplied cable. Everything was supplied to sync the address book with MS Outlook. And this alone was more than the Sony J5 and Motorola 280 ever did. With them, you had to buy the extra software -- which in the Sony's case was an eye-watering £120, for software alone, no hardware!

It's heavier. Why is this a good thing? Because it's less likely to get lost, it 'holds' more easily, and it balances easily on the shoulder when I'm using both hands. I also find these smaller, lighter phones get lost more easily in my pocket than the 888.

The 888 is no fatter than many more recent phones. The real problem with compactness is not the height or the width, but the thickness. It's like your wallet - you don't begrudge the size, but you want it to be as thin as possible. This one could be better, but there are many current phones that are worse.

The battery life is probably rather less than most modern phones, but I'm not absolutely sure.

It has a 'weight' which allows me to hold it more easily, and balance it on my shoulder.

Reception and speech clarity has always been pretty good. I bought an external aerial, but have never had cause to use it. My one was on Vodafone, but it's not 'locked', and I was able recently to buy a Virgin SIM and have it work straight off.

The 888 has a large keypad. For my fingers (and I'm not the only one) it's easy to feel and hit the right buttons, something that very few other phones can offer now. Obviously many people will disagree with me, but the point is that I feel there are still many people like me, and this is one of the few phones that answers our needs.

The earpiece is interesting. It's much less fussy about the position against which you hold it to your ear, compared with the other phones I've used recently. This might be due to the 'recess' near the earpiece, spreading the sound. Most other phones which have just one 'sound hole' are very fussy in this respect.

The 888 doesn't have wap. It doesn't have GPRS. It doesn't have predictive text - texting is quite laborious. It doesn't have graphics. It doesn't have vibration alert. It doesn't have skins. It doesn't have downloadable ringing (although it does have programmable ringing tones, but my attempt at 'Land of Hope and Glory' sounds amusing!)

But the 888 does have a feel in the hands, and a 'balance' like no other phone I've used. I don't know why people call it a 'brick'. I think it's shaped like a phone!

Last year, at a very good discount, I also bought a spare battery, a desktop charger and an FM Radio-cum-handsfree kit - presumably all discounted because the phone was 'obsolete'.

After traipsing around the phone shops for a year, and still not finding a decent modern phone, I'm going to buy another Ericsson SH888 second hand if I can find one. Or pay up to £100 to get this one repaired. That's how much I like it.

Advantages Solid build, built in data, infra red, good battery life
Disadvantages ugly, big, bulky
I am the telecoms/it manager at changing_mans company and yes the SH888s are brick like but they were the first phones (and still one of the only) to feature a built in modem, also the very fact that one of our directors HAD to smash it against a wall 4 times should be a plus point.

This company has a shocking reputation for mobile phone damage and not even a certain person here managed to break his (he knows who he is!!!!)...

A design classic, no. A great functional, well made and well featured mobile, yes.

Common misspellings on this brand: eficsson , ericseson , ericssopn , eri8csson


© 2007-2010 MobilesData.com™